Page 6 of 6 FirstFirst ... 456
Results 51 to 55 of 55
  1. #51
    SCOUSER
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    liverpool
    Posts
    1,124
    Country: England

    Re: San francisco garters?

    i suggested a recessive eastern because i was thinking that this paring would produce young that were visually san frans which is the object of the exercise, i am supposing that using infernalis would give a snake that visually represents something between the two which is not what you would want.
    having said that my knowledge of genetics is woeful.
    ​I'm not actually a gynecologist...but i'll take a look.

  2. #52
    Banned
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    12,873
    Country: United States

    Re: San francisco garters?

    Quote Originally Posted by infernalis View Post
    In theory it would make more sense to use Infernalis stock since that species is so nearly identical and from the same area??
    It wouldn't make any sense to "strengthen" them by crossbreeding with any other subspecies. No matter what you do from that point on, they aren't SF garters anymore.

  3. #53
    Forum Moderator Stefan-A's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Southern Finland
    Posts
    12,389
    Country: Finland

    Re: San francisco garters?

    Quote Originally Posted by infernalis View Post
    In theory it would make more sense to use Infernalis stock since that species is so nearly identical and from the same area??
    Appearance isn't everything. It wouldn't be any different from breeding them to any random T. sirtalis subspecies.

  4. #54
    Forum Moderator Stefan-A's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Southern Finland
    Posts
    12,389
    Country: Finland

    Re: San francisco garters?

    Quote Originally Posted by PINJOHN View Post
    It would be interesting to know how members see the future of the san fran,do you for instance foresee the developers winning and leaving no place for these stunning snakes?
    The developers will win and the inbred captive population will create a demand for fresh material from an already declining wild population. Within the next 30-50 years it'll get the IUCN classification EW and then possibly EX, unless San Francisco gets teleported away and the former habitats are restored.

  5. #55
    It's all about the Fuzzies jitami's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    3,337
    Country: United States

    Re: San francisco garters?

    That's closer to what I was thinking, Stefan. The developers have already won if you want to put it that way. There's already too much development, too much urban sprawl, and too many people. I think our only hope for their survival in the 'wild' is if they adapt and expand their range... but without human assistance I really don't see this happening and with human assistance it would very likely be at the cost of another species struggling to survive.
    Tami

    Oh. Because you know, it seems to me that, aside
    from being a little mentally ill, she's pretty normal.

Similar Threads

  1. San Francisco garters
    By GarterNovice in forum General Talk
    Replies: 34
    Last Post: 01-26-2009, 02:15 PM
  2. San Francisco Garters in Europe - family tree?
    By Conners in forum General Talk
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: 01-01-2009, 03:39 PM
  3. 3 baby san francisco
    By CrazyHedgehog in forum Breeding
    Replies: 35
    Last Post: 08-15-2008, 02:20 PM
  4. San Francisco Garter Snake
    By Boots in forum Wiki Discussions
    Replies: 27
    Last Post: 11-23-2007, 04:41 PM
  5. Valley Garters and Red spotted garters for sale
    By Brian in forum For Sale/Trade/Adoption
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 09-22-2006, 09:06 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •