Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 25
  1. #11
    Domos Ophiusa gregmonsta's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Perth
    Posts
    4,287
    Country: Scotland

    Re: Holiday snake(s)

    Well, no pics yet but the little one has been eating like clockwork. Went straight onto fish without a second thought.

    As it stands there were 3 stillborns and lots of slugs. The worrying thing is that mum is still heavy and still producing the occaisional slug. A bit like last year when she was passing slugs over a period of a couple of months.
    Keeping - 'Florida blue' sirtalis, concinnus, infernalis, parietalis, radix, marcianus and ocellatus.

  2. #12
    "PM Boots For Custom Title" chris-uk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    Midlands
    Posts
    3,477
    Country: United Kingdom

    Re: Holiday snake(s)

    Good to know that the little one is eating well. As for the mother, do you think that she's just not cut out for reproducing?
    Chris
    T. marcianus, T. e. cuitzeoensis, T. cyrtopsis, T. radix, T. s. infernalis, T. s. tetrataenia

  3. #13
    Banned
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    12,873
    Country: United States

    Re: Holiday snake(s)

    The only way to determine that is to breed her with different males and see if the outcome changes. That doesn't mean there's something wrong with the male, or her, but that they just can't reproduce well together. The male might do just fine with a different female, and the female might do just fine with a different male.

    If she does this regardless, I would say there's something wrong with her lady parts. That has been known to happen. If that's the case, breeding her is risky to her health.

  4. #14
    Domos Ophiusa gregmonsta's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Perth
    Posts
    4,287
    Country: Scotland

    Re: Holiday snake(s)

    Well, the little one, despite having been an avid feeder, was unfortunately found dead two days ago .

    My overall evaluation is as follows:


    • The litter was premature. She wasn't expected to drop anything until now. Several of the slugs contained 'mini-snakes' and 'Snakus Christ' was very much on the small side too.
    • The litter seemed to have two distinct stages of development. The earlier stillborn passed, were normal sized and well developed. Later stillborn were as described above.
    • The above points could indicate: 1) Some fully formed babies, though dead, were retained from last year and spoiled the litter. or 2) She had started to produce a new litter prior to he male being introduced (she was acting 'horny' at the time) and fertilisation somehow occurred in two 'stages'.


    Other things are probably possible. I'll be leaving her out of breeding until 2014 to see if anything else crops up. Her sister is attempting a litter using retained sperm, but she has been a point of confusion as I was expecting to see something from her around December. And no .... I definitely didn't get them mixed up ... it's all a bit backwards with these 2.
    Keeping - 'Florida blue' sirtalis, concinnus, infernalis, parietalis, radix, marcianus and ocellatus.

  5. #15
    "PM Boots For Custom Title" chris-uk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    Midlands
    Posts
    3,477
    Country: United Kingdom

    Re: Holiday snake(s)

    Quote Originally Posted by gregmonsta View Post
    2) She had started to produce a new litter prior to he male being introduced (she was acting 'horny' at the time) and fertilisation somehow occurred in two 'stages'.
    The little one had the odds stacked against him coming from an odd litter like this you never know what impact it had on his health.

    I wouldn't have thought she would have been fertile to enable two fertilisations. The reproductive system (I'm basing this on mammalian reproduction, but reptiles have similar endocrinology) should produce hormones that will prevent the female producing fertile eggs once she's carrying fertilised eggs. That isn't to say that something could have gone wrong with the hormone levels, but it would seem less likely than other explanations.
    Chris
    T. marcianus, T. e. cuitzeoensis, T. cyrtopsis, T. radix, T. s. infernalis, T. s. tetrataenia

  6. #16
    Banned
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    12,873
    Country: United States

    Re: Holiday snake(s)

    Quote Originally Posted by gregmonsta View Post
    Well, the little one, despite having been an avid feeder, was unfortunately found dead two days ago .

    My overall evaluation is as follows:


    • The litter was premature. She wasn't expected to drop anything until now. Several of the slugs contained 'mini-snakes' and 'Snakus Christ' was very much on the small side too.
    • The litter seemed to have two distinct stages of development. The earlier stillborn passed, were normal sized and well developed. Later stillborn were as described above.
    • The above points could indicate: 1) Some fully formed babies, though dead, were retained from last year and spoiled the litter. or 2) She had started to produce a new litter prior to he male being introduced (she was acting 'horny' at the time) and fertilisation somehow occurred in two 'stages'.


    Other things are probably possible. I'll be leaving her out of breeding until 2014 to see if anything else crops up. Her sister is attempting a litter using retained sperm, but she has been a point of confusion as I was expecting to see something from her around December. And no .... I definitely didn't get them mixed up ... it's all a bit backwards with these 2.
    "1) Some fully formed babies, though dead, were retained from last year and spoiled the litter"

    I don't think so. Retaining dead babies would have been fatal in short order due to septicemia. I also don't think that fertilization was done in "two stages". I think the different stages is due to development problems, rather than different timing.

  7. #17
    Smells Like Teen Spirit Invisible Snake's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    1,796
    Country: United States

    Re: Holiday snake(s)

    Sorry for your loss

  8. #18
    "Fourth shed, A Success" thamneil's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Winnipeg
    Posts
    826
    Country: Canada

    Re: Holiday snake(s)

    Sorry to hear that. Never nice losing an animal, especially one that is seemingly doing well.
    Neil
    The Thamnophis Aficionado

  9. #19
    Domos Ophiusa gregmonsta's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Perth
    Posts
    4,287
    Country: Scotland

    Re: Holiday snake(s)

    Quote Originally Posted by ConcinnusMan View Post
    "1) Some fully formed babies, though dead, were retained from last year and spoiled the litter"

    I don't think so. Retaining dead babies would have been fatal in short order due to septicemia. I also don't think that fertilization was done in "two stages". I think the different stages is due to development problems, rather than different timing.
    Probably more likely. But I do think embryos can be retained for longer than we give this sort of occurrence credit for, especially when sealed in their membranes or amongst partially calcified yolk material. The timing is strange, as is that at 1 month+ premature I would received 4 seemingly full-term neonates, and a mixture of slugs and premature newborns.

    Another note would be that she passed a rather large blockage several weeks after the initial labour - 3 slugs, squashed together with one of the 'mini-snakes' sandwiched in between. These slugs were more white-ish/calcified than the softer material which may have had to pass this blockage beforehand.
    Keeping - 'Florida blue' sirtalis, concinnus, infernalis, parietalis, radix, marcianus and ocellatus.

  10. #20
    "PM Boots For Custom Title" chris-uk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    Midlands
    Posts
    3,477
    Country: United Kingdom

    Re: Holiday snake(s)

    On the balance of what you've described I think the most likely explanation is that she retained some embryos that didn't develop, then had some fresh eggs fertilised. It's possible that the retained eggs made the environment inhospitable for the newly fertilised ones, hence she had what can only be described as a miscarriage and her body subsequently expelled the older blockage.
    It sounds plausible, but it's one of those mysteries that is impossible to know what happened.
    Chris
    T. marcianus, T. e. cuitzeoensis, T. cyrtopsis, T. radix, T. s. infernalis, T. s. tetrataenia

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •