Page 2 of 5 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 44
  1. #11
    Forum Moderator Stefan-A's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Southern Finland
    Posts
    12,389
    Country: Finland

    Re: Taxonomic discussion

    Quote Originally Posted by Steven@HumboldtHerps View Post

    So what do you think of these?
    They all look like definite fitchi to me, but you're the local.

    This next one, however, is very interesting:

    Quote Originally Posted by Steven@HumboldtHerps View Post

    A muddled "Coast" with all the red flecking...
    Are you positive that it's not something else? I know counting supralabials isn't a fool proof way of identifying T. elegans, since it can be 7 on one side and 8 on the other, but that one does have 7. I know this is going to sound stupid, but is there any chance at all that it could actually be an ordinoides? Nevermind, the scale rows seem to be 19, not 17.
    Last edited by Stefan-A; 11-07-2008 at 03:45 AM.

  2. #12
    T. radix Ranch guidofatherof5's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    C.B,Iowa(radixville)
    Posts
    23,452
    Country: United States

    Re: Taxonomic discussion

    Great looking snakes. They would be welcome here in Iowa anytime.

  3. #13
    In Hog Heaven
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Saint Paul, MN
    Posts
    2,140
    Country: United States

    Re: Taxonomic discussion

    Oh, Steve Have I missed you. Great brain candy! Don't stop!
    2.0 NY Eastern Garters; Peepers, Jeepers
    3.1 Western Hoggies; Kenabec, Niizh, Kokopelli, Anasazi
    3.0 Puget Garters; Kunikpok, Tungortok, 'Rockster
    1.0 Eastern Milk; Carmello

  4. #14
    "Preparing For Third shed" Steven@HumboldtHerps's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Eureka, CA (Humboldt County)
    Posts
    402
    Country: United States

    Re: Taxonomic discussion

    Quote Originally Posted by Stefan-A View Post
    They all look like definite fitchi to me, but you're the local.

    This next one, however, is very interesting:


    Are you positive that it's not something else? I know counting supralabials isn't a fool proof way of identifying T. elegans, since it can be 7 on one side and 8 on the other, but that one does have 7. I know this is going to sound stupid, but is there any chance at all that it could actually be an ordinoides? Nevermind, the scale rows seem to be 19, not 17.
    Not at all stupid! My first impression was ordinoides. The coastal elegans though often displays these colorful fusions that are very reminiscent of Northwesterns. It is currently believed that ordinoides, elegans, and atratus may all be sister taxons. Check out Californiaherps.com - Gary Nafis' site is a great quick resource for pics and info for western herps. The coastal elegans variations are shown. The Natives sightings on HumboldtHerps.com also shows many of our local morphs. I believe guide map ranges are out of date (even Peterson's). You are right regarding the fitchi-like appearance of the 1st 2 garters. This also has to do with range map interpretation. T. s. infernalis is confined to south of the Klamath River and fitchi is to the north. I have seen the effects of fitchi all the way to the Mad River (30+ mi. south), but then this could be a grand assumption, for the appearances may just be a result of ecotypic plasticity. I personally believe the whole subspecies concept is no longer an applicable taxonomical interpretation of what is really happening with some of these species. Nature abhors a vacuum, and it is always changing. It's we humans who always feel compelled to have everything in order. "Mother Nature" doesn't care. "She" is just doing her thing. I also suspect ordinoides' range to be much further south than what is printed even in the latest guides.

    Steve

  5. #15
    Forum Moderator Stefan-A's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Southern Finland
    Posts
    12,389
    Country: Finland

    Re: Taxonomic discussion

    Keep talking, Steve. This is the most interesting stuff I've seen on this forum in months.

  6. #16
    "Third shed, A Success" prattypus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Aurora Colorado
    Posts
    568
    Country: United States

    Re: Taxonomic discussion

    Geez. I don't understand 80% of what's been said here, but here I am enthralled and nodding like I get it. This is great!
    Jason--
    Red 5 Standing By...

  7. #17
    I am not obsessed.... GartersRock's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    San Marcos, TX
    Posts
    1,693
    Country: United States

    Re: Taxonomic discussion

    Quote Originally Posted by Stefan-A View Post
    Keep talking, Steve. This is the most interesting stuff I've seen on this forum in months.
    Agreed! Keep talking! I love it!!
    Amanda Tolleson

  8. #18
    Mr Thamnophis ssssnakeluvr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Salt Lake City, Utah
    Posts
    4,637
    Country: United States

    Re: Taxonomic discussion

    [quote=Steven@HumboldtHerps;85937]

    I've gone on about this topic before, but I'd like to post a few example photos here to show my frustration with the gestalt of some of these snakes. First, Stefan-A, I understand T. e. terrestris has been absorbed by T. e. elegans (Great! Now the elegans clade has a whole plethora of morphs to add to its list!), but could you find me a link about this, as I would love to read it. So... "Mountain Garters" here on the coast and in our coastal ranges come in all kinds of patterns and colors, but most all the coastals have olive-green, olive-brown, light olive-tan, or near black heads.


    I thought I read that terrestris was now vagrans....let me know what you find out....I am trying to look up and find out what I can also.....





    So what do you think of these?







    Definitely think this is fitchi....I have a male fitchi from Utah with the orange flecking on the belly....plus, being all black with the red...haven't seen a fitchi with any other background colors.... VERY nice female too!!!!! I love fitchi!!!!





    may be also a fitchi.....good pic, but can't quite tell the colors well enough....







    well....ooops....by looking at the neck shot.....I would say formerly terrestris.....has more greenish background colors......

  9. #19
    Mr Thamnophis ssssnakeluvr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Salt Lake City, Utah
    Posts
    4,637
    Country: United States

    Re: Taxonomic discussion

    Quote Originally Posted by Steven@HumboldtHerps View Post

    A muddled "Coast" with all the red flecking...


    I would say this is a coast garter for sure......

  10. #20
    The Leader of the Eastern Gang anji1971's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Windsor, Ontario
    Posts
    3,306
    Country: Canada

    Re: Taxonomic discussion

    Quote Originally Posted by prattypus View Post
    Geez. I don't understand 80% of what's been said here, but here I am enthralled and nodding like I get it. This is great!
    You took the words right out of my mouth!
    It is quite interesting stuff, isn't it? I guess if I lived in an area with so much variety in species, I'd probably be more knowledgeable of the subject. Steve, you're a lucky guy to live where you do!
    Anji

Similar Threads

  1. Humidity Discussion
    By Zephyr in forum Husbandry
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 01-02-2009, 07:18 PM
  2. Taxonomic changes: T. elegans
    By Stefan-A in forum General Talk
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: 07-07-2008, 03:13 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •