Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 40
  1. #11
    Forum Moderator Stefan-A's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Southern Finland
    Posts
    12,389
    Country: Finland

    Re: T. s. tetrataenia or T. s. infernalis???

    Quote Originally Posted by Hollis_Steed View Post
    euthanize! Are you kidding me? There are plenty of people out there (like me) who are not interested in breeding and just enjoy the snake for the snake. Before you decide to euthanize I will gladly pay shipping to give one a good home!
    There will always be accidental litters, though. One day it's just one hybrid, the next it's 30, just because somebody, possibly with no interest in breeding, decided to put two snakes in the same container for some perfectly valid reason. It saves a lot of trouble to just euthanize them IF they actually are hybrids.

  2. #12
    "Third shed, A Success" prattypus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Aurora Colorado
    Posts
    568
    Country: United States

    Re: T. s. tetrataenia or T. s. infernalis???

    They wouldn't be hybrids though, would they? Wouldn't they be classed as intergrades? This happened in captivity, but don't the CA RED SIDE and SAN FRAN ranges overlap in nature- or did so in the past?
    Jason--
    Red 5 Standing By...

  3. #13
    "Third shed In Progress"
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    433
    Country: United States

    Re: T. s. tetrataenia or T. s. infernalis???

    Hybrids, who care's! The moment we took them out of nature, that ended, they're pets now, regardless of where the ancestors lived

  4. #14
    "Third shed In Progress"
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    433
    Country: United States

    Re: T. s. tetrataenia or T. s. infernalis???

    Genetic drift occurs in nature, so keeping 'pure' breeds in captivity in the long-run is laughable

  5. #15
    Forum Moderator Stefan-A's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Southern Finland
    Posts
    12,389
    Country: Finland

    Re: T. s. tetrataenia or T. s. infernalis???

    Quote Originally Posted by prattypus View Post
    They wouldn't be hybrids though, would they? Wouldn't they be classed as intergrades?
    The term intergrade has certain ecological and evolutionary connotations. Basically, anything produced as a result of human activity, whether that occurs in the wild through introduction, or in captivity through crossing, would be a hybrid.

  6. #16
    Forum Moderator Stefan-A's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Southern Finland
    Posts
    12,389
    Country: Finland

    Re: T. s. tetrataenia or T. s. infernalis???

    Quote Originally Posted by bkhuff1s View Post
    Hybrids, who care's! The moment we took them out of nature, that ended, they're pets now, regardless of where the ancestors lived
    What ended?

    Quote Originally Posted by bkhuff1s View Post
    Genetic drift occurs in nature, so keeping 'pure' breeds in captivity in the long-run is laughable
    What they won't do, is turn into hybrids or jump from one limb of the phylogenetic tree to another.

  7. #17
    "PM Boots For Custom Title" count dewclaw's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Fingerlakes Region New York
    Posts
    1,394
    Country: United States

    Re: T. s. tetrataenia or T. s. infernalis???

    I have always wondered if T. s. tetrataenia was a pattern morph of T. s. infernalis that was local to the San Francisco area....Does anyone know what information was used to classify them as a sub-species separately from T. s. infernalis?
    LeAnn
    "The early bird catches the worm, but the second mouse gets the cheese."
    "Jokes are for kids, but puns are for the grown."

  8. #18
    Forum Moderator aSnakeLovinBabe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    4,162
    Country: United States

    Re: T. s. tetrataenia or T. s. infernalis???

    Quote Originally Posted by count dewclaw View Post
    I have always wondered if T. s. tetrataenia was a pattern morph of T. s. infernalis that was local to the San Francisco area....Does anyone know what information was used to classify them as a sub-species separately from T. s. infernalis?

    yea.... this is exactly what I was gonna say.... is there anything that separates them, apart from pattern? I know that because they are their own population they are genetically separate, but could they have actually been a striped mutation of infernalis that just happened to sominate that area? I have a plains garter that is striped and smeared like that first infernalis pictured, a really unique snake... she is a sibling to Scott Felzer's "aztec" there were only 2 born in that clutch, to a wild mother....

    when you compare strictly visuals, my striped plains is to plains garters, what San-Frans are to infernalis!
    Mother of many snakes and a beautiful baby girl! I am also a polymer clay artist!


  9. #19
    Old and wise snake charles parenteau's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Drummondville
    Posts
    953
    Country: Canada

    Re: T. s. tetrataenia or T. s. infernalis???

    It's very very interresting!!!

  10. #20
    Forum Moderator Stefan-A's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Southern Finland
    Posts
    12,389
    Country: Finland

    Re: T. s. tetrataenia or T. s. infernalis???

    Quote Originally Posted by aSnakeLovinBabe View Post
    yea.... this is exactly what I was gonna say.... is there anything that separates them, apart from pattern? I know that because they are their own population they are genetically separate, but could they have actually been a striped mutation of infernalis that just happened to sominate that area? I have a plains garter that is striped and smeared like that first infernalis pictured, a really unique snake... she is a sibling to Scott Felzer's "aztec" there were only 2 born in that clutch, to a wild mother....

    when you compare strictly visuals, my striped plains is to plains garters, what San-Frans are to infernalis!
    Molecular phylogeography of common garter snakes (Thamnophis sirtalis) in western North America: implications for regional historical forces

    Our molecular analyses suggest that T. s. tetrataenia (San Mateo Co.) is not genetically unique from other California populations. However, geographically nearby populations (Sonoma Co., Santa Cruz Co., and Contra Costa Co.) belong to a strongly supported clade that does not include San Mateo Co.
    So basically, it's yes and no. They are not very different overall from other T. sirtalis in the area, but whatever they're surrounded by, they're not closely related.

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 38
    Last Post: 10-25-2007, 12:32 PM
  2. My tetrataenia babies.
    By adamanteus in forum Husbandry
    Replies: 20
    Last Post: 08-26-2007, 09:41 AM
  3. YES!!!!! Tetrataenia baby's!!!
    By jewel-dragons in forum Breeding
    Replies: 29
    Last Post: 04-21-2007, 10:56 AM
  4. YES!!!!! Tetrataenia baby's!!!
    By jewel-dragons in forum General Talk
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 04-17-2007, 01:37 PM
  5. Picture of my T. s. tetrataenia...
    By Thamnophis in forum General Talk
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 08-08-2006, 07:05 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •