Discussion: Photographic Libary/Species Identification Thread.

[Steveo]

Wait, I thought we were voting Stefan to do the whole thing.

Same. I did not use commas for a reason!

[Stefan-A]

Same. I did not use commas for a reason!

Wait, I thought you were giving me the option to participate in a fight to the death.

[guidofatherof5]

Wait, I thought you were giving me the option to participate in a fight to the death.

No fighting needed. The job is yours.

[Stefan-A]

No fighting needed. The job is yours.

I'd take a dive first.

[Steveo]

Plot twist: the loser has to do it.

[Stefan-A]

Plot twist: the loser has to do it.

Are you volunteering?

[SilasBannook]

Guys,
How do you want to handle morphisms? I am excited about this project you are proposing. I expect a lot of conversation on this thread will deal with positive association of a morph with its base classification. Perhaps that concept goes without saying for this project. Just wanted to raise the flag on that as that will be one of the coolest things I think people will look to on the library. Base identification of snakes will be a major use but this could become a great tool to help standardize naming and classification of morphs. I am looking forward to the project and have one unique snake I believe will be a good contributor.
Suggestion is a identification field for morphism. If there is none, the subject picture(s) would say none, otherwise there is a lot of value to specifying the different morphisms of the snake pictures you will have.