Its oh so quiet Shh Shh

[jwolfe152]

Moms: Do Your Sons a Favor and Let Chickens Keep Their Wings | PETA.org

this is a crazy accusation on what eating chicken does to unborn boys and girls

in the link they had in the article i see a lot of "may" and "implied" used, anyone else hear about this anywhere?

[chris-uk]

Moms: Do Your Sons a Favor and Let Chickens Keep Their Wings | PETA.org

this is a crazy accusation on what eating chicken does to unborn boys and girls

in the link they had in the article i see a lot of "may" and "implied" used, anyone else hear about this anywhere?

It's a press release from PETA, therefore it is almost certain to contain factual inaccuracies and dubious science in an attempt to produce sensationalist new reports.
FFS.... of all the reasons for pregnant women to avoid eating chicken, the most reasonable one would be the risk of salmonella from factory farmed chicken. Taking the "chicken will give your unborn baby a small *****" is just a desperate attempt at making a story out of nothing.

[infernalis]

Simply placing links to "news" on a page does not make any of it fact.

So obese moms have babies with clogged arteries, notice that they simply throw this tidbit at you without connecting it directly to moms eating chicken?

The use of distorted context grants the illusion that these otherwise random tidbits are somehow connected to each other.

[Stefan-A]

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/arti...hp-118-998.pdf
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/arti...113-001056.pdf

[infernalis]

I see things like prenatal exposure to high doses... would this apply to a mother consuming a chicken dinner during pregnancy?

Granted, I only skimmed the papers Stefan, Will read in greater detail in a bit.

[jwolfe152]

i only read a small part of the .PDFs because i just get lost/confused really quick, but on the second one the said the used the Anogenital distance (AGD) to determine size. Well on the AGD wiki (Anogenital distance - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia) "Yet another study, by Swan et al., has determined that the AGD is linked to fertility in males, not ***** size.[3]" how do people like me know which one study is really the case? i may try and read the pdfs again but i doubt i get much from it.

[Stefan-A]

i only read a small part of the .PDFs because i just get lost/confused really quick, but on the second one the said the used the Anogenital distance (AGD) to determine size. Well on the AGD wiki (Anogenital distance - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia) "Yet another study, by Swan et al., has determined that the AGD is linked to fertility in males, not ***** size.[3]" how do people like me know which one study is really the case? i may try and read the pdfs again but i doubt i get much from it.

The source reference on wikipedia points to the exact same article. The good news is that there's only one study here, the bad news is that it's now a matter of interpretation (or rather reading comprehension).

[ConcinusMan]

It's a press release from PETA, therefore it is almost certain to contain factual inaccuracies and dubious science in an attempt to produce sensationalist new reports.

The use of distorted context grants the illusion that these otherwise random tidbits are somehow connected to each other.

So basically it's no different than news from other sources.

how do people like me know which one study is really the case?

Why bother.

[jwolfe152]

Dinner time with a salad and chicken alfredo with broccoli and bell peppers





what are you having or what did you have?

[Mommy2many]

I had a baked potato, loaded
A Greek salad with red wine vinagerette
Cabernet
It all was yummy. Yours looks yummy too