erythristic?

[ConcinusMan]

i think thats a bad statement, i dont consider a snake with more red to be always Erythristic, you can call it that, but i wouldnt

That's the definition. Now, for example if a flame eastern is to be called a "erythristic flame eastern" it would have to have considerably more red than most flame easterns. I wouldn't call just any flame eastern erythristic. Furthermore, I wouldn't call a red phase radix erythristic just because most radixes aren't red. Red radixes are normal. I would only call it erythristic if that red radix had considerably more red than most red phase radixes.

I would call a concinnus with dark red, and more of it, erythristic because it's more red than most.

It's quite a subjective term according to definition. There's definitely room for abuse of the term.

In related news... Why is it that concinnus are so prized for their striking orange or red and yet people are tripping over themselves to get the anery (lacking red) concinnus I have? Weird.

Not all of these anery's lack orange pigment. Some are just highly reduced pigment. In that case they are still anerythristic. Having no red, or highly reduced red when compared to most concinnus.