Cameras and photography

[CrazyHedgehog]

After my first attempt at the wildlife thread...pretty chuffed with my 'hand me down' camera..
Just wondered what cameras people used?
This is my hand me down....
Amazon.co.uk: Olympus SP-510 Ultra Zoom Digital Camera Silver & Black (7.1MP, 10x Optical Zoom) 2.5" LCD: Olympus: Electronics & Photo (http://www.amazon.co.uk/exec/obidos/ASIN/B000HDXH28/interactiveda3005-21)

this is Mafs new baby!!
NEW!~ OLYMPUS E-410 D-SLR CAMERA E410 + 2 LENS + 4GB CF on eBay, also, Digital Cameras, Photography (end time 13-May-08 00:50:43 BST) (http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/NEW-OLYMPUS-E-410-D-SLR-CAMERA-E410-2-LENS-4GB-CF_W0QQitemZ200222995038QQihZ010QQcategoryZ31388QQ ssPageNameZWDVWQQrdZ1QQcmdZViewItem)

I have no idea what I am doing yet... but give me time!

[jeanette]

ive got a kodak easy share camera, cant use it though, guess i need lessons

[Sid]

I'm currently using a Kodak EasyShare CX7430 myself. Really like it so far.

[Elliot]

I have an old 3.2 megapixel Sony Cybershot with no zoom or macro mode. Not so great for snake pictures. :o

[adamanteus]

Fuji FinePix S5700. 7.1 mega pix, 10X optical zoom, macro and super-macro modes. Love it!:D

[KITKAT]

Fuji Finepix A900

It is a nine megapixel, and I love it:D

[EdgyExoticReptiles]

Nikon d-70 and soon to have a new macro lens :)

[Stefan-A]

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ5, 5 megapixels. Great if you can get within an inch of whatever it is you're shooting.

[aSnakeLovinBabe]

panasonic lumix DMC fz-18, i cant remember if it is 8 or 10 megapixels! wonderful camera though....

[reptileparadise]

Fuji Finepix S5600 with raynox macro filter
The macro filter is a must with this cam...

[anji1971]

I have an Olympus FE-115, with 5 megapixels. It has a super-macro function, which is my favourite thing to use. Probably has some other good functions too, but I have yet to find them!

[dashnu]

I have a Sony Cyber Shot.. 7.2 mega pixels DSC-W120. I just picked it up not to long ago, works well however when I try to get a full zoom close up things get blurry. I need to sit down with the direction and learn how to use it.

Kinda OT: I swear that my snakes love taking pictures!! A lot of the time they take cover when i mess aroung with the enclosure, not when my camera is out though. Those guys will let me stick the camera directly ontop of them basically.. Its pretty funny.

[bulrush]

I have a Kodak Easyshare CS6330 or something. It does great pictures, with great color, except in macro mode, I cannot get closer than 5 inches. I think I'll have to get up to 5 inches, then use my optical zoom to get closer.

For clear pictures I always use a mini tripod. I can set it on a table, or even set it on my chest when I stand and get a nice clear picture. The mini tripod is about 8 inches long, with legs that extend another 6 inches out if I need it. Very handy as it fits inside my camera case also.

[count dewclaw]

I use a Canon PowerShot A620, 7.1 mega pixels, 4X optical zoom. For a reasonably priced camera I have been thrilled with it, especially after I found the macro button!

[Stefan-A]

So, I'm probably getting a new camera as soon as I figure out what I actually need.

On one hand, a Panasonic DMC-FZ50 would probably be enough (Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ50 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Panasonic_Lumix_DMC-FZ50)). On the other hand even a basic DSLR is far more versatile. If I choose a SLR, it's either going to be a Canon EOS 450D, Nikon D60 or a Sony A350.

Opinions?

[Charlet_2007]

ok am i the only one that's going all out for a cam this time? We've decited one a Canon Rebel!!!! Tired of the ones at are like 100.00 breaking down ever year..

Walmart.com: Canon EOS Digital Rebel XSi Black ~ 12.2 MP Digital SLR Camera Kit w/ 18-55mm Lens: Digital Cameras (http://www.walmart.com/catalog/product.do?product_id=9208352)

[Snake lover 3-25]

wow nice!!!!:D:D

[Stefan-A]

ok am i the only one that's going all out for a cam this time? We've decited one a Canon Rebel!!!! Tired of the ones at are like 100.00 breaking down ever year..

Walmart.com: Canon EOS Digital Rebel XSi Black ~ 12.2 MP Digital SLR Camera Kit w/ 18-55mm Lens: Digital Cameras (http://www.walmart.com/catalog/product.do?product_id=9208352)
I think that's the same Canon 450D I'm considering.

[adamanteus]

The Canon 450D would be my camera of choice.... if I could justify spending the money.... top camera! Whatever you choose, I'm looking forward to seeing your results, Stefan.

[Stefan-A]

Yeah, but do I really need a SLR?

[NetBSD]

i got my digital camera about as year ago, cheap-o one from radio shack for $95 i think it was, 6.0mp samsung s630. it hasd gone thru hell and still works fine for what it is. one day id liek to get a real nice camera but i cant see spending that much cash on a camera for me to bust it up when im out on my 4x4 adventures

[reptile3]

I used to have an HP digital camera, don't remember the specs, but it was good. I never got to learn how to use it. after 5 yrs, we had to replace it. We got a Kodak EasyShare Z700 4.0 mp 5X zoom.

Then for my Bday(sept), I bought myself a Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T70 8.1 mp, only con is 3X zoom. But it's ok, most of the subjects I shoot are right there in front of me!!! LOL DSC-T70 | Silver Cyber-shot® T70 Digital Still Camera | Sony | SonyStyle USA (http://www.sonystyle.com/webapp/wcs/stores/servlet/ProductDisplay?catalogId=10551&storeId=10151&langId=-1&productId=8198552921665200469)
(best camera for me, I love it), has macro feature, never knew what that was, till 2 weeks ago..

I bought it through Crutchfield.com got $20 off, then an extra $20 off!! So I saved $40.

[guidofatherof5]

I use 2: Kodak EOS digital rebel and Sony Cybershot 8.1 Nice zoom and great macro. Both bought at Sam's Club well under their value. Sony was $40.00 after it had been returned. It is beatup but takes great pictures. The EOS was a last years, last one, and the manager let me have it for 325.00. Got lucky on cameras. Can we post video on this forum? Have a Sony Hi-Def camcorder and would like to post some feeding video.

[NetBSD]

I use 2: Kodak EOS digital rebel and Sony Cybershot 8.1 Nice zoom and great macro. Both bought at Sam's Club well under their value. Sony was $40.00 after it had been returned. It is beatup but takes great pictures. The EOS was a last years, last one, and the manager let me have it for 325.00. Got lucky on cameras. Can we post video on this forum? Have a Sony Hi-Def camcorder and would like to post some feeding video.



thats a good idea, i got a few feeding videos id liek to share, maybe we need a video section?

[kurtnagel]

After years of point and shoot digital (Mostly Canon SureShot or Nikon CoolPix) I longed for the versatility I used to have with my old Olympus OM-1 Even though the Coolpix 5400 was very versatile, it was still limited so I splurged on a Nikon D80. I love it! SLR versatility and Quality combined with digital point-shoot-delete (repeat) is awesome.

[Loren]

I use a Canon A95 5 megapixel. Does good for what I paid for it, and for the fact that its an older model now.

[Stefan-A]

If I get a SLR, I will also need a suitable lens. :D

Recommendations?

[reptileparadise]

Depends on what you want to shoot!
For garters? 60 mm from the camera brand or maybe 90/105 mm from a third party (sigma/tamron)

I'll be saving for the nikor 60mm next year. Possibly the sharpest lense they have produced so far and affordable!

[Stefan-A]

Depends on what you want to shoot!

Reptiles. In captivity and in the wild.

I'm probably getting the Canon 450D.

[reptileparadise]

Hmmm, with wild reptiles a longer focal lenght might be better. I guess you'll be buying from a store? Or from the internet?
If its a store, try to see what fits your needs. Most stores don't mind you testing out the lense in the shop

Sigma 105 might be a good choice. I think canon has a 100mm as well. But that costs a pretty penny
*edit* price of a canon 100mm is okay I guess...*

[Stefan-A]

I'll buy it over the internet, the prices in the stores are absolutely ludicrous.

[reptileparadise]

Yep, thats true

I can reconmend these sites though
http://www.dpreview.com (http://www.dpreview.com/)

Pixel-Peeper -- More than 100,000 full-size sample photos from lenses, SLR cameras and digicams. (http://www.pixel-peeper.com/)
All Tests / Reviews (http://www.photozone.de/Reviews/overview)
Photodo - Photographic lens specifications, guides, discussion and reviews (http://www.photodo.com/)

[Stefan-A]

Thanks for the links. :)

Kit or body only? The kit comes with an 18-55 and the price difference is about 50€.

[Stefan-A]

Nevermind, I went for the kit + a 60mm macro lens. :D

Soon I'll be poor again.

[reptileparadise]

you'll be shooting excellent pics soon then!
You know the rules...post every picture you take with the new cam :D

[Stefan-A]

you'll be shooting excellent pics soon then!
You know the rules...post every picture you take with the new cam :D
I took 12 217 pictures with the one I have, are you sure you want me to post every picture I take with the new one? ;)

It'll be a couple of weeks before I get the new camera. The store has to order the macro lens from the importer. :rolleyes:

[reptileparadise]

Yeah, still pretty sure about it!
Canons 60mm is a really, really sharp lens! You might need to get some bandaids ;)

[Stefan-A]

I went to a couple of local stores just to compare prices today. One store wanted 200€ more for a Sony A300 Kit, than the store online store I'm using. They also wanted 100€ more for the A200 Kit. The other store was a bit more reasonable, their Canon 450D Kit only cost 50€ more than the one I ordered.

For 200€, the customer service better include a "happy ending".

I've avoided the more expensive store deliberately for years. Ever since I started to compare its prices to those that other stores have, I've been telling everybody I know that they should avoid that store. Their prices are completely insane (for example, they wanted twice as much for my current camera, than I actually paid) and they seem to live entirely off of loyal customers and people who don't want to use online stores.

[JSI]

Check here and see if the site you are using is listed.

Ratings and Reviews for Stores at ResellerRatings.com: Search: Showing All Stores (http://www.resellerratings.com/rlist-s1-n2.html)

Be very cautious of "discount" online camera stores. There are a lot of horror stories from places that seem too good to be true.

Jeremy

[Stefan-A]

It's not on that list, but I know my online store very well, I've used it at least 20 times without any problems in the last 10 years. Their prices may not be the lowest, but they come damn close. It has a very good reputation (here's a good opportunity for them to ruin it).

On friday they still hadn't gotten the lens from the importer, but according to the order status they have all the parts now and somebody just needs to pack and ship them. I don't want to get optimistic here, but with a little luck, they'll be on their way tomorrow.

[Stefan-A]

I got the camera. The battery is charging, the manual is waiting to be read.

[reptileparadise]

DONT read the manual :P You're a guy right? :D

Good luck with the camera...

[Stefan-A]

DONT read the manual :P You're a guy right? :D

Good luck with the camera...
Like I said, it's waiting to be read. :D Might have to wait a long time.

[JSI]

Great choice in camera. I've had a 350D/Rebel XT for several years now. Great camera. I use it as a backup camera now because I've added a 40D for more usability but both get frequent use.

[Stefan-A]

http://koti.mbnet.fi/thamnoph/photos/nucam1.jpg

A part of one of the first pictures I took with the macro lens. Had to use the flash, though. And I shut off the autofocus, it was pissing me off.

[reptileparadise]

Looks good!
but I cant read the exif :(

What in the autofocus was pissing you off?

[Stefan-A]

It shouldn't have any exif info. It's just a small part of the original picture, copied in IrfanView and pasted into Paintshop Pro and saved as a new image file.

The autofocus wouldn't focus on the right spot. There's probably something in the manual that would tell me why that is and how to correct it. ;)

[reptileparadise]

It shouldn't have any exif info. It's just a small part of the original picture, copied in IrfanView and pasted into Paintshop Pro and saved as a new image file.

The autofocus wouldn't focus on the right spot. There's probably something in the manual that would tell me why that is and how to correct it. ;)


Ah, that explains a lot!

The autofocus might focus in the wrong spot because of the focus metering. Is it set to focussing in the middle, in the sides or just anywhere where the camera thinks it should be sharp?

I've set my camera to focussing in the middle, just because thats mostly where the subject is

[Stefan-A]

Okay, how do you do that?

[reptileparadise]

I'm not a canonite! You should use the manual!

[Stefan-A]

Didn't have to rtfm, figured it out.

[reptileparadise]

I had to think about that one (rtfm) ...But I think I got it...
So....did it say it had to focus somewhere you didn't want it to?
Ah, never mind...go and play with your new toy!

[Stefan-A]

So....did it say it had to focus somewhere you didn't want it to?
Nope, found the button. :D It's going to take some time to get used to this camera.

I could also use my tripod right about now. But I don't have it here.

[JSI]

You could always use MF (Manual Focus).

But yes you can easily scroll through the focus points and select which one you want to use.

Best thing you can do is use "M". I learned so much about photography when I stopped letting the camera do all the thinking. You've got a camera now that is "better" than a point and shoot so you might as well figure out why it's better.

Jeremy

[reptileparadise]

Yeah, tripods can come in handy. Not always, but defenitly under low light.

[jitami]

Sounds like you're having fun already Stefan. Please let us know how you like the camera and lense once you play with it for a while :)

[Stefan-A]

Yeah, I can't wait to test it under better light conditions. I didn't manage to get a single sharp snake photo. Although, I wouldn't have gotten one with the old camera either.

[Tori]

I use an old Fuji FinePix S 3000 digital. Nothing impressive, but it works.

[drache]

congrats to your new camera, Stefan
it took me a while to figure out mine and there's still stuff look up now and then
I hardly ever use anything automatic on a camera - it's totally set to manual
I hate those whirring sounds, when the camera adjusts the focus and I hate the delay
sorry - I'm a control freak and can't stand automatic transmission in cars either
it all pisses me off because I can focus faster than the camera and I can shift faster than a car's digital pea brain and when I want something to happen, I want it now, not when they're good and ready

[Stefan-A]

http://koti.mbnet.fi/thamnoph/photos/lotrofl1.jpg

[reptileparadise]

Nice picture :D
Sharp where it needs to be sharp ;)

But damn you and your exif data!

[Stefan-A]

http://koti.mbnet.fi/thamnoph/extra/obananawan.jpg

You don't need to see my exif data.

[reptileparadise]

Yes I do...
http://www.xtremets.com.au/store/images/Curious-George%20header.gif

[Stefan-A]

What for? :D

[reptileparadise]

I always check EXIF data. If the picture is good, you can learn things about it!
I cant check your exif data, but my guess would be ISO 1600...f4,5 or maybe a bit less...1/50 shutterspeed ???

[Stefan-A]

I always check EXIF data. If the picture is good, you can learn things about it!
I cant check your exif data, but my guess would be ISO 1600...f4,5 or maybe a bit less...1/50 shutterspeed ???
Can't do anything to the picture without losing the exif information, so here it is:

File: - E:\ALBUM\IMG_0176.JPG

Make - Canon
Model - Canon EOS 450D
Orientation - Top left
XResolution - 72
YResolution - 72
ResolutionUnit - Inch
DateTime - 2008:11:06 21:52:22
YCbCrPositioning - Co-Sited
ExifOffset - 196
ExposureTime - 1/160 seconds
FNumber - 2.80
ExposureProgram - Manual control
ISOSpeedRatings - 400
ExifVersion - 0221
DateTimeOriginal - 2008:11:06 21:52:22
DateTimeDigitized - 2008:11:06 21:52:22
ComponentsConfiguration - YCbCr
ShutterSpeedValue - 1/166 seconds
ApertureValue - F 2.83
ExposureBiasValue - 0
MeteringMode - Center weighted average
Flash - Not fired, compulsory flash mode
FocalLength - 60 mm
UserComment -
SubsecTime - 30
SubsecTimeOriginal - 30
SubsecTimeDigitized - 30
FlashPixVersion - 0100
ColorSpace - sRGB
ExifImageWidth - 4272
ExifImageHeight - 2848
InteroperabilityOffset - 9506
FocalPlaneXResolution - 4865.60
FocalPlaneYResolution - 4876.71
FocalPlaneResolutionUnit - Inch
CustomRendered - Normal process
ExposureMode - Manual
White Balance - Auto
SceneCaptureType - Standard

Maker Note (Vendor): -
Macro mode - Normal
Self timer - Off
Quality - Fine
Flash mode - Not fired
Sequence mode - Continous
Focus mode - One-Shot
Image size - Large
Easy shooting mode - Manual
Digital zoom - None
Contrast - Normal
Saturation - Normal
Sharpness - Low , -32769
ISO Value - 32767
Metering mode - Center weighted

[reptileparadise]

Wow, I was way of at the ISO

[Stefan-A]

Yeah, you didn't really get anything right. ;)

I still need to learn how to use it properly. Any words of wisdom regarding what ISO to use in what situation, how the shutter speed and aperture size is used best etc. I can of course learn it through trial and error, or by reading all the tutorials on the net. ;)

But I was under the impression that you're supposed to use a low ISO under these conditions.

[reptileparadise]

Well, lets see.
Low ISO means less light sensitivity of the film. In other words, you'll mostly use low ISO (64/100/200) in very bright conditions.

Shutter speed depend on what you want to shoot. Tongue action? High shutterspeeds (1/200 or higher)
Do you have an tripod and you want as much natural light as you can...then the lower shutter speeds are good.
I use 3 seconds for fireworks (just an example)

aperture
The bigger the aperture (big aperture = low number= lots of light coming thru)
the less depth sharpness. So, a small focussed spot in the picture.
A small aperture (higer number=less light coming thru) means more sharpness in the picture. It does require more light (in other words, longer shutter opening or higher ISO)

This is it actually...Very short and stubby, but thats just about the basics you'll need.
For macro, I try to use f8 or higher and with a 60mm I would keep 1/60 as a minimum.
I would use ISO200 mostly and maybe ISO400 is noise apears at ISO 200 (its commonly thought that higer ISO induces more noise, but even low ISO with long shutterspeeds van induce noise)
You'll probably have to flash with these settings...But flashing doesnt always ruin the colors. Play with the aperture, shuterspeed, ISO and whitebalance to correct the influence of the flash

[Stefan-A]

Thanks a lot, that was really all I needed. :) A short and simple explanation. I did already know the basics, but things like how the aperture affects the sharpness.. Well, I did know that it would have some effect. :D

I bought a good tripod for my spotting scope years ago, and I have a pocket-sized one that's not going to be of much use, I suspect. I guess I won't be shooting any of my snakes freehand anymore. In fact, I don't think I'll need to, with this camera and this lens.

I don't use flash unless I absolutely have to. Even if it doesn't completely ruin the colours, it does tend to ruin the shadows.

[reptileparadise]

Yep, true...and thats where the SB800 comes in handy ;)

I've yet to buy one, but the results of external flashes can be great :D

[drache]

wow - Mikhaila is excited that the middle school we looked at yesterday has a darkroom
a darkroom - that seems so archaic now
and yet, good old-fashioned silver-based photography is the best way to learn about light and to experience the wonder of chemistry/magic of alchemy
didn't know where else to put that

[adamanteus]

At last I have a DSLR.:D

http://i289.photobucket.com/albums/ll228/adamanteus_bucket/People/Various/2010_0711newcamera0020.jpg

[Stefan-A]

Excellent choice. :) What model?

[adamanteus]

450D or as the Americans would call it 'Rebel XSi'. Very pleased!:D

[drache]

congrats, James
looking forward to your photos

[adamanteus]

I think I'll need a fair bit of practice with it before I produce anything of quality.

[mustang]

450D or as the Americans would call it 'Rebel XSi'. Very pleased!:D
my dads gotta rebel its awesome!

[ConcinusMan]

panasonic lumix DMC fz-18, i cant remember if it is 8 or 10 megapixels! wonderful camera though....

Yeah, we know that from your awesome photo's Shannon. Way awesome photos.:D

I've owned several digital cameras over the years and never was very happy with them, but this one I bought just a few weeks ago is absolutely awesome.

Not only does it take outstanding quality pictures and HD video, but it's also a cinch to use. Really easy, very intuitive and uncluttered interface. I love it.

Nikon coolpix S6000 14.2 megapixels, 7X optical zoom, 1280 X 720p HD video with stereo sound. Under $300.:D

I highly recommend it, even for "dummies". No lessons required.

<object width="560" height="340"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/Ik76nokwu2Q&amp;hl=en_US&amp;fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/Ik76nokwu2Q&amp;hl=en_US&amp;fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="560" height="340"></embed></object>

I mean, look at this!
http://img31.imageshack.us/img31/272/dscn0606large.jpg

Add a 8GB SD card and you can take lots of HD (720p) video too. Simply awesome.
<object width="560" height="340"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/d3QB706pAxw&amp;hl=en_US&amp;fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/d3QB706pAxw&amp;hl=en_US&amp;fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="560" height="340"></embed></object>

[gartermorphs]

Concinussman i have that exact camera that i just got and i love it!

[ConcinusMan]

Concinussman i have that exact camera that i just got and i love it!


I love it too! great isn't it?

[gartermorphs]

yup but im still having trouble uploading pics!

[guidofatherof5]

yup but im still having trouble uploading pics!

It seems one of the problems with uploading is that the photo isn't format to the proper size.
When you try to upload do you get any message as to why the upload failed?
Would you describe the problem you're having. Thanks


User File Limits Allowable Image Types:jpg,jpeg,png,gifMaximum File Size:2048k file size limit.
ZIP file uploads allowed (5.12mb limit).

[gartermorphs]

it usually say that the file your uploading is to large

[guidofatherof5]

You need a program that will make your photos email ready. I use Microsoft Digital Editing Software. I can save a photo as "email ready".
I know Adobe Photo Shop does the same job, many other programs will also.
I'm sure there are Shareware(free) programs out there to.

[ConcinusMan]

You can't upload pics taken with a 14.2 megapixel camera because at actual size, the frame is WAY too big and the file size is big too. You need to resize it to something reasonable such as 1024 X 768. I'm still using XP and so I use "image resizer" which is part of Powertoys for XP. Then, you will be able to upload it. You could also use imageshack and choose a resize option. You could then have picture appear in the post instead of a thumbnail you click. I don't even bother uploading to the forum in a post. I hotlink to the picture at imageshack.

[RedSidedSPR]

I'm in need of a new camera. I've been looking around alot, and there's a lot of good cameras within the $300 range.

Thing is, not many focus in macro... I couldn't care less about subject tracking and face recognition.

The only things I take pictures of is nature, so anything outside, but mostly animals, especially reptiles, an ESPECIALLY my snakes. I've filled an entire SD card with nothing but my snakes. So macro is important.

I'd like to stick with the little compact digitals, but something bigger is fine. Problem is those are often
more expensive.

Ive been leaning toward the Nikon coolpix series.


But I'd like to hear what you garter-gurus use!

[Mrs N1ntndo]

I use a Kodak Easy Share Camera and it works great after you figure out what things to put it on for pics . I love it. It only cost me I think 30-40 and that was at Walmart. Plus it is able to do video as well.

[jitami]

You know, I used to use an Easy Share, too. I've since passed it on to my mom, but it was a great little camera. I have an older Sony Cybershot DSC H-5, now. It's great, but has more of a delay than I would like and I wish it had a true burst feature. It has a burst setting, but puts the consecutive, rapid fire, shots on one pic in little frames... if that makes any sense at all? That and it takes AA's, which I prefer, but you don't ;)

[RedSidedSPR]

Thanks!

Easy SHare isn't what i'm looking for... i need something a little more capable.

I can live with AA as a long as the cameras worth it...

[katach]

DSC H-2 Love it!!!

[RedSidedSPR]

I'll keep that in mind!

[Hornets23]

I'm looking for one too...I've been researching it and have a few potentials but i'm not totally sold yet..

[ConcinusMan]

Thanks!

Easy SHare isn't what i'm looking for... i need something a little more capable.

I can live with AA as a long as the cameras worth it...

And if you ever get one with an internal rechargable lithium ion battery, you'll never want to go back to any other power option. I plug my Nikon Coolpix s6000 into USB on the computer, or a wall charger and it's fully charged in less than an hour, and will run for days before needing a charge again.

Some pics taken with the Nikon Coolpix s6000. I never took photos this good until I got this camera. A $100 or less, camera just doesn't cut it. They eat up expensive batteries, don't go long on a charge, and really don't take photos like this. And the HD video it takes? Outstanding!

http://desmond.imageshack.us/Himg195/scaled.php?server=195&filename=macro006large.jpg&res=medium

http://desmond.imageshack.us/Himg96/scaled.php?server=96&filename=macro009large.jpg&res=medium

http://desmond.imageshack.us/Himg714/scaled.php?server=714&filename=butterfly014large.jpg&res=medium

http://desmond.imageshack.us/Himg109/scaled.php?server=109&filename=macronature003large.jpg&res=medium

http://desmond.imageshack.us/Himg864/scaled.php?server=864&filename=macronature005large.jpg&res=medium



http://desmond.imageshack.us/Himg88/scaled.php?server=88&filename=x023large.jpg&res=medium

[RedSidedSPR]

Oh yeah, I have that kinda battery now, that's why I hate AA.

That's still the series I'm leaning towards. Nikon coolpix... liking your S6000, which led me to the others, like the S8100... but I keep looking at s6000 cause it's cheap now..... REALLY REALLY REALLY want HD video. Can't stand my video... Especially after YouTube craps it down so much.

[ConcinusMan]

Oh yeah, I have that kinda battery now, that's why I hate AA.

No camera is worth it. They go through them too fast. I don't care how great the pics are, it's not worth saving a hundred bucks only to pay that out in batteries in the first year.

[RedSidedSPR]

Stupid touch screen... posted before I was done typing.

Yeah, that's what keeps me from buying AA cameras... although the rechargeables arent THAT bad. But still.

Coopixs all have great video... S8100 has 1080p, (and slo mo lol)... really likin those. Especially after seeing your pics.

[ConcinusMan]

The rechargeable AA's are even worse. Even on a full charge, they don't last near as long as disposables and they will only take a charge so many times before they need replaced. I went that route before. It sucked worse than buying disposables.

[RedSidedSPR]

Oh... Didn't realize. Yup... staying away from AA if possible.

Is the S6000 720p, or 1080p?

[ConcinusMan]

It's 720p for HD but there are other video options you can choose that are not HD.

Audio file format: AAC stereo
HD: 1280x720p / 30fps
HDMI output: mini-connector Type C
Movie file format (compression stream codec): MPEG-4 AVC H.264
Movie container format: *.MOV
Small Size: 320x240 / 30fps
Standard TV: 640x480 / 30fps

Just remember that thing I said about high megapixels not really mattering. High megapixels on a crappy camera is still going to look worse than lower megapixels on a good camera. Same thing applies to HD. Sort of. 1080p video will look not so good on a TV or monitor that is 720p natively. However, 720p video will look just fine on a 1080p TV screen or monitor with much higher native resolution. ;)

Most modern LCD monitors go way beyond 1080p. Mine is 24.5 inch 16:10 and the resolution goes way beyond 1080p. (technically, it's 1200p) So, as a result, it doesn't seem to make any noticeable difference if I play 720p or 1080p video on it. It pretty much looks the same. Where you run into display quality issues is if you play a video on your screen that is higher resolution than your monitor. A good way to demonstrate what I mean is to set your monitor to a fairly low res and go to youtube and play a 1080p video and you'll see what I mean. It will look worse than a format that is lower than your monitor.

[RedSidedSPR]

Yeah. I don't even pay attention to the megapixels anymore. I mean, would rather have a 14.0 than 5.0, but you know.

I had no idea about the 720 1080p stuff.. Good to know...
When you read the customer, (i.e. amateur) the S8100 (1080p) has amazing video, but than the real reviews (CNET etc) say it's not worth buying the camera for the video...

I really will probably end up with the S6000... no matter how many cameras look at, theres always something that makes me not want it. Can't find many cons to the S6000.

[ConcinusMan]

Me neither. And as long as it's still available, it only gets cheaper (to a point) with every new model that comes out. Quite frankly, you can't really go wrong with any of the Nikon models available. Just choose one with the features you need, and within your price range. Ignore the megapixel rating. It's pretty much irrelevant beyond 8 megapixels. You won't even notice a difference between 12 and 16 so there's no need to pay more for the higher rating.;)

Higher optical zoom is worth paying more for though. Definitely.

[RedSidedSPR]

Yeah, I'm liking all the nikons... 8.0 megapixel or higher is fine with me.

The S6000 isn't displayed etc anymore, which led me to the s1800 and others, which are sweet! But... $200 more..

Thanks

[ConcinusMan]

The S6000 isn't displayed etc anymore

ORLY? nikon coolpix s6000 - Google Search (http://www.google.com/search?q=nikon+coolpix+s6000&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a#q=nikon+coolpix+s6000&hl=en&client=firefox-a&hs=id&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&prmd=ivnsr&source=lnms&tbm=shop&ei=twhcTrSsDtPViAK1o_TQDg&sa=X&oi=mode_link&ct=mode&cd=5&ved=0CGkQ_AUoBA&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.&fp=1a687eecc1c71bd2&biw=1672&bih=882)

[RedSidedSPR]

I don't know what that was for... I obviously wasn't clear again.

I meant not displayed at Walmart and Best Buy like the new coolpix's.

Was just saying that when I'm looking at cameras in person, I see other coolpix"s I like (S8100) but still end up liking the S6000 best... Except for the 8100.. loving that one.

[ConcinusMan]

Well of course it's not at the store.(where you will pay more for it anyway) Too many newer models to fill the space.

I'm still trying to figure out why the 8100 specs say "30-300mm" but the face of the camera itself says "5.4-54.0 mm"

The zoom on that thing is outstanding. Better than mine. And holy crap, the macro capability blows mine away. My macro specs: Approx. 1.2 in. (3 cm.) to infinity. the 8100: Approx. 0.4 in. (1 cm.) to infinity. In other words, even when the lens is only 1cm away from the subject, it can still focus on it. Lower megapixels but I doubt you would even notice the difference.

Definitely a nice camera. Essentially the same, but with better zoom and macro.

[RedSidedSPR]

I know WHY it's not displayed... Not saying it's weird and unfair.:rolleyes: Saying that is what led me to the S8100 WHICH IS BEAST.

Macro. Yeah baby. You said it, 0.4.. holy crap.

1080p video.... eh... It gets good, and bad reviews. But it records slow motion.:p

Pop-up flash gets in the way but reduces blur, and obviously is awesome....

Great camera both of them... I see no cons to s6000 but have found several flaws in the S8100... But the macro, man.........

[guidofatherof5]

Sony SteadyShot DSC-W190 12.1 mega pixel
Sony Handycam HRD-UX5 4 mega pixel Stills
Olympus Stylus 1030 SW 10.1 mega pixel
Canon Digital EOS 6.4 mega pixel

[chris-uk]

Any photos you see from me will have been taken with my Canon G9 (although I crop and resize any before posting online, you don't want a 4000x3000 pixel picture on the forum) - all the features of an SLR except interchangeable lenses, but pocket sized. And in macro it can focus down to 1cm.
Biggest problem I have is getting the snake to hold a pose at the right angles for the best light.

[RedSidedSPR]

I got a new camera for Christmas (we also got a 32" LED TV and Bluray player but let's not get carried away) amazing flash and low light photos, something my camera lacked, couldn't take any good shots without sunlight. 0.4 inch macro. 0.4 INCH WHAT?!! Can't get much closer. I can litterally set the lens against something and have it focus.:eek:

And full 1080p video!

Consider this a teaser for what's to come.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PpVhwx0U_h8&list=UUDulsoo-ajZ4Sb45-WuPGtA&index=1&feature=plcp

[kibakiba]

Such cute little snakies!

[infernalis]

quite the holiday haul... must be nice.

[guidofatherof5]

Looks like you're not the only one who will benefit from the new camera.;)

[EasternGirl]

I got a new camera too but I haven't had time to hook it up to the computer yet. Awesome video Jesse!

[snakehill]

That boy is good with a camera!!! ;)

[RedSidedSPR]

quite the holiday haul... must be nice.

What's that supposed to mean.:p

Yeah, it is, I opened the camera I've been wanting, and a Big (compared to before) TV and bluray from the grandparents. SUH-WEET!


Looks like you're not the only one who will benefit from the new camera.;)

Guess not.:)


I got a new camera too but I haven't had time to hook it up to the computer yet. Awesome video Jesse!

Thanks, and looking forward to seeing what you do with yours.


That boy is good with a camera!!! ;)

Yeah, he is. Wait.....

[RedSidedSPR]

Here's some random photo's throughout my yard. The macro on this thing is AWESOME.

10X zoom too, I forgot to mention.

http://img713.imageshack.us/img713/8653/s8100064copy.jpg

http://img341.imageshack.us/img341/7591/s8100062copy.jpg

http://img141.imageshack.us/img141/1600/s8100054copy.jpg

http://img689.imageshack.us/img689/8570/s8100051copy.jpg

http://img854.imageshack.us/img854/1998/thamnophischristmas015c.jpg

You have no idea how tiny this flower is
http://img823.imageshack.us/img823/5820/thamnophischristmas012c.jpg

[RedSidedSPR]

Look... a key hole....
http://img220.imageshack.us/img220/7427/thamnophischristmas008c.jpg

Ouchy.. oh wait. They're not that bad. CUZ THEY'RE TINY!!
http://img84.imageshack.us/img84/4158/s8100063copy.jpg

http://img46.imageshack.us/img46/968/s8100053copy.jpg

[RedSidedSPR]

ZOOM!

http://img708.imageshack.us/img708/5784/s8100066copy.jpg

http://img638.imageshack.us/img638/6403/s8100067copy.jpg

[RedSidedSPR]

one of the things I've always had trouble with with my old camera, is the indoor, and low light photos. No flash indoor would be blurry. Flash on indoors would light everything up to the point of the snakes face being hidden in white. Low light was hopeless, and basically if you didn't have natural light, the photo would be crap.

The S8100 excels in low light, Flash or no flash, it's always looks good.... love it,

Looky.

No flash:
http://img705.imageshack.us/img705/3922/s8100021.jpg


Flash
http://img141.imageshack.us/img141/4420/s8100006.jpg
http://img856.imageshack.us/img856/2821/s8100008.jpg

WHAT?!

and here's NO LIGHT!!!
http://img33.imageshack.us/img33/7813/thamnophis004.jpg
By thamnophisman (http://profile.imageshack.us/user/thamnophisman) at 2011-12-27

[snakehill]

Nice!!!! ;)

[chris-uk]

Is it the holy grail? How are close-up photos with the flash? I still have to rely on good light using my Canon G9 in macro mode.
If you read any guides about macro photography they tend to focus of photographing stuff that doesn't move, if anyone has seen (or has) any good guidance for macro photography using a compact camera and moving targets I'd be interested to see the links.
My tips would be:
1. Hold the camera still by resting on the side of the tank or something else solid, or I use a gorilla pod sometimes. It's better to compromise the composition slightly to get a steady shot, you can crop it down later but you can't fix camera shake in Photoshop.
2. Flash will always washout the shot, so turn it off and use good ambient light.
3. Use manual focus, choose the focal point and move the camera to that distance rather than using any zoom or relying on autofocus.
4. Use the self-timer to help eliminate camera shake.
5. Expect to miss something like half the shots you attempt.
This is based on what I've learned so far using my G9, obviously other cameras may not have the same features or may have different strengths/weaknesses.

[RedSidedSPR]

Is it the holy grail? How are close-up photos with the flash? I still have to rely on good light using my Canon G9 in macro mode.
If you read any guides about macro photography they tend to focus of photographing stuff that doesn't move, if anyone has seen (or has) any good guidance for macro photography using a compact camera and moving targets I'd be interested to see the links.
My tips would be:
1. Hold the camera still by resting on the side of the tank or something else solid, or I use a gorilla pod sometimes. It's better to compromise the composition slightly to get a steady shot, you can crop it down later but you can't fix camera shake in Photoshop.
2. Flash will always washout the shot, so turn it off and use good ambient light.
3. Use manual focus, choose the focal point and move the camera to that distance rather than using any zoom or relying on autofocus.
4. Use the self-timer to help eliminate camera shake.
5. Expect to miss something like half the shots you attempt.
This is based on what I've learned so far using my G9, obviously other cameras may not have the same features or may have different strengths/weaknesses.

That's what I learned too, with my old camera.. Everything applies.

But this camera is just so...... easy.. when it comes to lighting.

[RedSidedSPR]

I got a new camera for Christmas (we also got a 32" LED TV and Bluray player but let's not get carried away) amazing flash and low light photos, something my camera lacked, couldn't take any good shots without sunlight. 0.4 inch macro. 0.4 INCH WHAT?!! Can't get much closer. I can litterally set the lens against something and have it focus.:eek:

And full 1080p video!

Consider this a teaser for what's to come.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PpVhwx0U_h8&list=UUDulsoo-ajZ4Sb45-WuPGtA&index=1&feature=plcp

Crap. Just realized I didn't upload in HD.......

[ConcinusMan]

Is it the holy grail? How are close-up photos with the flash? I still have to rely on good light using my Canon G9 in macro mode.

Same goes for the coolpix cameras, but heck, the price is right and the pics look great. As far as "wash out" goes, that will happen if you're closer than about 3 feet. Adjusting ISO sensitivity downward sometimes helps reduce "wash out" but it will also make any shadows very black.


If you read any guides about macro photography they tend to focus of photographing stuff that doesn't move, if anyone has seen (or has) any good guidance for macro photography using a compact camera and moving targets I'd be interested to see the links.
My tips would be:
1. Hold the camera still by resting on the side of the tank or something else solid, or I use a gorilla pod sometimes. It's better to compromise the composition slightly to get a steady shot, you can crop it down later but you can't fix camera shake in Photoshop.
2. Flash will always washout the shot, so turn it off and use good ambient light.
3. Use manual focus, choose the focal point and move the camera to that distance rather than using any zoom or relying on autofocus.
4. Use the self-timer to help eliminate camera shake.
5. Expect to miss something like half the shots you attempt.
This is based on what I've learned so far using my G9, obviously other cameras may not have the same features or may have different strengths/weaknesses.

Good tips. I might add that the coolpix cameras have a "vibration detection" mode so camera shake isn't as much of a problem, as long as light is adequate, making for a fast shutter speed. The camera adjusts exposure based on detected light levels. This is why it takes great pics in low light, but without a tripod, you'll get blur in low light from moving the camera in macro mode.

In artificial light, it takes better pics if you manually set the white balance to "incandenscent" or "florescent", etc. The preview gives you instant view of the effect of these white balance settings.

If you are not taking macro pics, and light is low, set flash to "on" but don't forget to change white balance to "flash" or the photo will look icy blue.

As far as manual focus goes, that's how I get the good shots too. If you press gently to focus, and hold, the camera will stay focused at that distance until you let go, or press harder to take the photo. I'll usually use that feature, hold the focus, and move the camera until my subject is in perfect focus.

As far as the "auto" setting goes, it's better than many cameras but I always get best photos in manual mode. You just have to learn the effects of the different settings to get the best results in manual mode. The coolpix settings menus are extremely easy to navigate so you can change settings very quickly, unlike some other PITA cameras. They are very easy to learn/use.

[PINJOHN]

I have also been given a camera for Xmas but reading all that has gone before this post tells me i have just inherited a major headache,...if i said my technical skills are woeful then you should consider that as bragging [they are infinitely worse than that,
for the record it is a olympus D_720 14 megapixel hd 10x super wide. all Greek to me i'm afraid

[chris-uk]

I have also been given a camera for Xmas but reading all that has gone before this post tells me i have just inherited a major headache,...if i said my technical skills are woeful then you should consider that as bragging [they are infinitely worse than that,
for the record it is a olympus D_720 14 megapixel hd 10x super wide. all Greek to me i'm afraid
John you should be able to get good pictures with it. I just had a quick look at some specs/features for that Olympus, so a couple of things I'd advise you to look for (bearing in mind I don't actually have the camera, so I'm making some assumptions based on information online)...
It can focus down to 1cm, so find out how to put it in macro mode, generally a button with a stylised tulip, or you may need to select it from a menu if you're unlucky.
You won't be able to use the flash when you're in macro mode, it will white out the picture, so work out how to turn off the flash.
The autofocus has a face recognition mode, which may be a default. I doubt the face recognition will recognise a snake, so I would turn that off if you find problems focusing.

At the end of the day it's digital, you get an instant view of what you've just taken, so have a play and take hundreds of photos to see how different modes respond. Enjoy the new toy. :)

[PINJOHN]

thanks Chris that's helpful ... to my surprise i understood at least part of your advice ....i am making big strides in this techno world... you will have to excuse me now as i am going to watch a movie on my betamax video recorder you just cant beat these new fangled gizmo's :D

[RedSidedSPR]

Same goes for the coolpix cameras, but heck, the price is right and the pics look great. As far as "wash out" goes, that will happen if you're closer than about 3 feet. Adjusting ISO sensitivity downward sometimes helps reduce "wash out" but it will also make any shadows very black.



Good tips. I might add that the coolpix cameras have a "vibration detection" mode so camera shake isn't as much of a problem, as long as light is adequate, making for a fast shutter speed. The camera adjusts exposure based on detected light levels. This is why it takes great pics in low light, but without a tripod, you'll get blur in low light from moving the camera in macro mode.

In artificial light, it takes better pics if you manually set the white balance to "incandenscent" or "florescent", etc. The preview gives you instant view of the effect of these white balance settings.

If you are not taking macro pics, and light is low, set flash to "on" but don't forget to change white balance to "flash" or the photo will look icy blue.

As far as manual focus goes, that's how I get the good shots too. If you press gently to focus, and hold, the camera will stay focused at that distance until you let go, or press harder to take the photo. I'll usually use that feature, hold the focus, and move the camera until my subject is in perfect focus.

As far as the "auto" setting goes, it's better than many cameras but I always get best photos in manual mode. You just have to learn the effects of the different settings to get the best results in manual mode. The coolpix settings menus are extremely easy to navigate so you can change settings very quickly, unlike some other PITA cameras. They are very easy to learn/use.

All this is very helpful, and I'll but not all if it applies to my camera, FYI

[RedSidedSPR]

Your camera has some of the macro capabilities as mine, John. Hit that flower and you could probably get some nice shots of your snakes, which none of use have ever seen, to my knowledge.:D

[EasternGirl]

I just got a new Canon PowerShot A1200 (12.1 megapixils) for Christmas. I love it! I still need to post some pics.

[reptileparadise]

Nikon D90
Nikon 50 mm f1.8
Nikon 18-105 f3.5 - f5.6
Nikon D90
Nikon MB-D80
Nikon 50 mm f1.8
Nikon 18-105 mm f3.5-f5.6
Tamron 70-300 mm f4-5.6
Tamron 90 mm f2.8 (MUST HAVE MACRO!)
Metz 48-af-1 external flash
Bounce
Table/Tripod stand/holder for external flash

[snakehill]

He got a Nikon camera! He loves to take her for a ride...........:p

[Light of Dae]

I didn't get anything for Christmas except what I bought myself... A 16mp Kodak C1550 easyshare digital camera. A 16g SD card, Rechargeable batteries n Charger, And a 9month old Checkered Garter snake George!


I found with it if I use the 'red eye preflash' I get awesome color with no wash out, however if I use just the regular flash I get some washout. I'm still learning this camera... I like it, just wish I could manually focus..

[RedSidedSPR]

Nikon D90
Nikon 50 mm f1.8
Nikon 18-105 f3.5 - f5.6
Nikon D90
Nikon MB-D80
Nikon 50 mm f1.8
Nikon 18-105 mm f3.5-f5.6
Tamron 70-300 mm f4-5.6
Tamron 90 mm f2.8 (MUST HAVE MACRO!)
Metz 48-af-1 external flash
Bounce
Table/Tripod stand/holder for external flash

Sweet!

[snakehill]

So what would everyone suggust would be a good camera for a clueless photographer? (My last camera was a polaroid spectra) :p

[RedSidedSPR]

So what would everyone suggust would be a good camera for a clueless photographer? (My last camera was a polaroid spectra) :p

Any digital point and shoot.

[snakehill]

Was considering a Kodak Easy Share. I read something about an issue with focus with this camera though.

[RedSidedSPR]

That's a cheap, decent camera, but not for snakes...

How much are you willing to spend?

[snakehill]

As little as possible! ;)

[RedSidedSPR]

Is $199 too much?

[Stefan-A]

So what would everyone suggust would be a good camera for a clueless photographer? (My last camera was a polaroid spectra) :p
Any bridge camera.

[snakehill]

Is $199 too much? Yes!

[RedSidedSPR]

So under $100-150?? That's not gonna get you anything much but I'll look around for you.

[snakehill]

Any bridge camera. Googled it! Looks complicated! :o

[EasternGirl]

I had a Kodak EasyShare and I hated it...I just bought a Canon PowerShot A1200 and it's so much better...the pictures were terrible on the EasyShare. The Canon was $92 with shipping on Amazon. I think it's very good for the money. Not complicated at all.

[RedSidedSPR]

I think she should start looking at Canon... it's got some cheap, but nice cameras. You can go to walmart, best buy or something and get your hands on a lot of Canon cameras

[EasternGirl]

Yep...see above.

[RedSidedSPR]

Yep.... saw above.

[snakehill]

I had a Kodak EasyShare and I hated it...I just bought a Canon PowerShot A1200 and it's so much better...the pictures were terrible on the EasyShare. The Canon was $92 with shipping on Amazon. I think it's very good for the money. Not complicated at all. Sounds perfect! I will start looking! Thanks Marnie! :)

[EasternGirl]

I like it...and I cannot work complicated cameras...it has a lot of cool features that I learned to work quickly. Takes good pics and you can even set the size of your pics for posting and emails right on the camera. Google it to look for the best price.

[ConcinusMan]

I didn't get anything for Christmas except what I bought myself... A 16mp Kodak C1550 easyshare digital camera. A 16g SD card, Rechargeable batteries n Charger, And a 9month old Checkered Garter snake George!


I found with it if I use the 'red eye preflash' I get awesome color with no wash out, however if I use just the regular flash I get some washout. I'm still learning this camera... I like it, just wish I could manually focus..

You can if you take it off of "auto" mode.:rolleyes: Manual focus on most any digital camera is done by pressing the button just halfway. When you reach your desired focal point, let go of the button. Next time you press the button down all the way, it snaps a photo at the set focal point. This does not work if auto focus or "auto mode" is on.(which is usually the default setting) ;)